Thursday, 29 December 2011

"So this is Christmas...

...and what have you done?" John Lennon once interrogated.  Except it's an unnecessary question really, isn't it?  Ask anyone how their Christmas went and you'll generally get a shrug of the shoulders and an "it was alright - we didn't do much".  Sometimes people will say "we treated ourselves and went out for dinner", which is your cue to then say "wow...that's great...no mess and someone else does all the cooking!" to which they'll usually reply "yes, but it was a bit expensive and it wasn't like a proper home Christmas".  Soporific conversations like that take place every. single. year.  

This year, probably due to the "exceptionally mild weather we've been having; it's all those deodorants" (thanks Nan), I've heard a lot of people saying they don't feel 'Christmassy'.  I thought I would combat this apathy by listing exactly "what I have done" this Christmas, just to remind myself what feeling 'Christmassy' actually means.  This goes as follows:
  • Listen to elderly relatives tell me about how I "didn't know what it was like to have to reuse things and go without at Christmas...not when there was a war on and everything was rationed".  Well...no, I don't.  I don't really think that's my fault, though; it's just a random accident of birth.  I could practise...if my Nan would only ration everything she gives me to eat that's gone out of date, that might be a good start!
  • Listen to middle-aged relatives tell me about their problems with BT and Sky's customer service departments.
  • Have fun telling kids what Christmas was like "in my day".  I'm in training for when I'm old; OK so I don't have a war to go on about, but when my friend's little girl was watching the Christmas edition of 'The Cube' I turned to her and said "When I was your age, Philip Schofield had brown hair".  She was suitably awed.
  • Listen to swathes of parents moaning about how kids aren't grateful for what they get at Christmas; how they aren't appreciative of all the effort that goes into everything.  But why should they be?  From my limited observations, they're not taught to.  When I was little (again!) I only got presents at Christmas, and I had to write everybody who bought me something a 'thank-you' note, even if the present was something terrible like a bath towel with a picture of a cartoon face on it.  It is just a general observation, but it doesn't seem as though either of those aspects of childhood Christmases are all that common now.  
  • Eat cheese.  Lots of it.  So much of it that I try to make myself feel better by saying "I'm going to give up cheese in the new year!" whilst knowing full well that by 3rd January I'll be enjoying a sandwich filled with Cheddar sliced so thickly it could be used to wedge the doors open at the Kremlin.  But it's all part of the fun, isn't it?
  • Watch rubbish films.  This year I tried the latest 'Sherlock Holmes' which was really awesomely bad and affirmed why I don't usually bother with non Bob Holness-related 'blockbusters'.
  • Eat chocolate.  Lots of it.  So much of it that I try...well, you know the drill.

Friday, 16 December 2011

The endless repetitions of Christmas

When I was sixteenish, I had a Christmas temp job in a handbag shop at the top of the High Street.  It was a pretty uninspiring job, on the whole.  I got trained in the properties of the dusty Samsonite suitcases situated at the back of the shop ("they're made of polyproplene, y'know...which is used in some types of aircraft so you can bet it'll withstand just about any impact") yet I was never asked about them.  I just worked on the till mostly, selling faux snakeskin handbags and things with tassels on them to bored members of the public.  Sometimes I got asked to tidy up the 'purse gondola' as a really special treat.

Accompanying me in these tasks was a "specially created mix tape" of background music which we were ordered to play by the shop's Head Office.  This tape consisted of four songs; Paul McCartney's 'Wonderful Christmas Time', Mud's 'Lonely This Christmas', Slade's 'Merry Christmas Everybody' and Elton John's 'Step Into Christmas'.  The effect of hearing these four songs on a constant loop from 8am until 6pm every Saturday from mid-November until Christmas itself now produces the same sort of effect as somebody hypnotised by Paul McKenna to dance like Michael Jackson every time they hear the opening bars of 'Thriller', in that as soon as I hear the opening bars of any of them I have to fight a desperate, all-consuming urge to beat the nearest person to death with a polyproplene Samsonite.  Or pack myself in one and have it thrown off the end of the pier (where it'd probably withstand the impact of hitting all that mud at the bottom of the Thames and I'd float listlessly back up again to the sound of 800 screaming children visiting 'Santa on the Pier').

So there's an example of a Christmas repetition I'm not exactly keen on.  But on the whole I can't really decide if I find the other repetitions (some would prefer to call them "traditions" I suppose) endearing or irritating.  Probably a bit of both.  I think the trick to their actual enjoyment is in not thinking too much about them or trying to intellectualise them, which unfortunately does leave me at a slight disadvantage!

Take school nativity plays, of which I saw a few this year due to the fact that I now have quite a few lovely children in my life.  Wonderful as it was to see them (and it really was!) I couldn't quite stop my mind wandering off to whether it's really a good idea to bring children up with the illusion that the Christmas story of 'Jesus being born in a stable by immaculate conception' is a given truth.  It's strange actually, in that for me that whole Jesus-being-born thing was always a weird story to believe even when I was a kid, but now I've heard it so many times that it's taken on a kind of surreal dreamlike quality, like someone's just been slurring it to you under the influence of LSD.  Mind you, the schools have obviously got tired of telling the straight story these days and insist on throwing disgruntled snowmen and supersonic lambs into the mix, just to spice it all up a bit.

Then there's the food.  I don't like mince pies all that much, but this year I found myself in the kitchen making Gordon Ramsay's 'crumble-topped extra-special mince pies' for reasons unknown, because I don't really know anyone else who likes mince pies all that much either.  But if you don't eat at least one in the period covering October to January, you are officially Weird.

There are some repetitions I do rather love, though.  Such as watching 'It's a Wonderful Life' and 'White Christmas'; films that don't ever get old or boring, and present-buying and wrapping and seeing people you actually quite like - Christmas makes you put in the effort, really, which can only be a good thing...if it didn't exist, we'd probably have had to invent it.

Monday, 12 December 2011

It's written in the stars!

Astrology has been part of my life from an early age.  Well, not exactly "part of my life"; that makes it sound as though I don't leave the house without consulting Russell Grant, Mystic Meg and Jonathan Cainer first.  I suppose it'd be more accurate instead to say I was exposed to astrology-type stuff from an early age.  My Mum used to study astrology and draw up people's birth charts for them...when my sisters and I would go to her house on a Sunday there'd be astrological paraphernalia all over the place.  Textbooks, notepads and compass-drawn charts with confusing squiggles and symbols all over them that somehow held the mystery to that person's exact personality.  As a child all this seemed quite magical; even though when I found out what my own star sign is (Leo) I didn't like it.  It seemed bossy and masculine, and I used to pretend I was Libra instead (which is ironic given the supposed nature of Leo personalities).

Given my love of stupid personality quizzes it seemed only inevitable that at some point I'd do an "Are You Like Your Star Sign?" type quiz, which whenever I do I've always found that I am "a typical Leo with a fine, balanced personality and a delight to know" (that's not just me blowing my own trumpet, honest, I did a quiz and it really said that!  Really!).  But I then took the same quiz for every other sign and found that I was also a "typical Capricorn", a "typical Sagittarian", a "typical Aries"...and so on.  So much for my being "unique and special" - which was how my star sign had been described!  I felt royally cheated.  Another astrologically-based quiz was bold enough to attempt describing me physically, as someone with "problem feet and can't-do-anything-with-it hair" (they must have seen my Facebook pictures).

But some people do take astrological signs very seriously.  My Nan, for example, says that the older she gets, the more she sees how true people are to their signs; conversations with her are always peppered with "well he's a Scorpio and everybody knows they're secretive buggers", or "she's the dullest person I ever met - typical Virgo" (don't worry; I've made those specific examples up!)  And once I was out with a friend and we got talking to a rather strange man who asked what our star signs were.  He approved of mine, but when my friend said she was Capricorn his eyes narrowed in fury.  "I HATE Capricorns!" he said, practically spitting venom at her as he spoke, and he walked off in a baffling huff (he must have been a Cancerian; I hear they're sensitive like that).

I've never taken astrology that seriously.  But I will admit to reading my stars every now and again, and especially at the start of a new year.  I'll promptly forget everything it said roughly five minutes after I've read it, but while I'm reading it it's...well, it's nice.  Because in the stars, everything's going to turn out alright, even when you're told it's going to be "a challenging year".  I can understand why some people use astrology like others use religion; as a comforting, mostly harmless, voice of reason.

(But then I would think that, as a Leo with an Aquarian rising sign).

Thursday, 8 December 2011

A Christmas morning in Southend High Street

Christmas presents are rubbish if you haven't wrapped them up, right?  I think so, anyway.  I don't ask for much, just that my presents have been wrapped nicely - preferably with bows and ribbon and a whisper of glitter (but not so much that it gets all over your fingers) in complementary colours and a nicely-written gift card.  Naturally, because I demand such high standards from others, it's only fair that I offer exceptional gift-wrapping myself (it probably helps that I actually enjoy the whole 'wrapping presents' ritual every year, which takes me a good six hours and a couple of medicinal glasses of flavoured Bailey's - this year it's Biscotti flavour - to get it all finished.  But when it's done it's really, satisfyingly done...and Christmas isn't Christmas without beautifully wrapped presents, whether they're for me or not).

All this is the reason I found myself battling Southend High Street in the morning, to ensure I got enough tags, ribbons and bows to accompany my annual wrap-fest.  This is an important section of Christmas shopping I can't do online, just in case the paper's too flimsy and the ribbon too stringy or the tags too glittery.  I have to see it all properly before I can buy it (and now I'm aware I don't sound too sane, so I will move on with the story...)

The very first sight I encountered as I rounded the corner into the High Street was a man in a black bobble hat and orange shorts running as fast as he could, clutching a cluster of silver and shiny things, shooting past me in a frenzied flash.  He was being pursued by a man in a high-viz jacket but it was obvious he wasn't going to catch him...he was a bit older and fatter, plus he didn't really look like his heart was in the chase.  I stopped and watched them for a moment; so did a little boy who asked his Mum "why is that man chasing the other man?"  His Mum thought for a moment, then said "they're playing a Christmas game" which I thought was a great answer, and probably not far from the truth!

Next stop: Caffe Nero for a quick caffeine fix.  Well, I needed sustenance after such a harrowing scene.  I walked in; there was a long queue.  There's always a long queue in coffee shops at Christmas, it's The Law.  The reason, of course, is because every year all the coffee chains release a range of festive drinks it always takes an age to actually make.  The poor flustered man at the counter was working on his own that morning; my request for a plain black coffee instead of a Toffee Nut Latte or an Amaretto Hot Choc or a Mistletoe Mocha (I made that last one up, but it sounds nice doesn't it?) almost earned me a big sloppy kiss!

(Those incidents always remind me of the time I went to Debenhams' coffee shop with my sister and there was a huge poster up behind the counter advertising a new drink called a 'Millionaire's Mocha'.  My sister looked at the poster and said to the lady at the till "I think I'll try one of those Millionaire's Mochas, please".  The lady, who looked all of about ninety, gave her a careworn, world-weary look and said "What's that, love?"  My sister pointed to the poster and she sighed, then shouted across to the kitchen "What's in that fluffy new drink we're selling now?"  Nobody really seemed to know, but a few squirts of canned cream, freeze-dried chocolate and toffee pieces later and my sister had something resembling the drink on the poster...if Picasso had painted it.  She tasted the drink, said it was less "millionaire's mocha" than "penny pincher's dishwater" and we laughed like drains about it for ten minutes).

Coffee over with, it was off to the gift-wrap shop where I purchased everything I needed; the man ringing everything up at the till said "Going to wrap some Christmas presents, are you?" and I replied with the only logical answer I could think of, which was "Yes".


It was an eventful morning, on the whole.

Friday, 2 December 2011

Customer Service at Christmas...a fable for our times

It's been one of "those" weeks.  One of "those" weeks involves an inordinate amount of interaction with our local friendly service providers; usually something I try to avoid save for a pleasant smile at the checkout.

I blame Christmas, personally, and all the needy people in my life who selfishly demand the dangerous combination of good presents and my time over the festive period.  This involves my having to order a load of presenty-stuff online (I don't do "normal" Christmas shopping after a particularly horrendous and traumatic trip to Lakeside about three days before Christmas a few years ago) and it also involves my having to call various restaurants and book tables for dinner.

And when I'm forced to do those things, this is what tends to happen...

Encounter One: Customer Service Rep at UPS Courier Services


Me: Oh, hello.  I just popped out for five minutes and I saw one of your drivers called round.  They literally only left the card a few minutes ago so I wondered if it might be possible for you to get in touch with them and let them know I'm home now, and will be all day?

Him: (after a few long seconds' silence, gruff mumble) No.  S'not possible.

Me: (after waiting a few moments to maybe be asked for details, or if I'd like to rearrange delivery or something generally helpful like that) Oh.  OK, then.  'Bye.

Encounter Two: Cashier at WHSmith


Me: Hi.  As I came in I set your security alarm off by the doors.  I just wanted you to know I haven't stolen anything! - do you need to check my bag before I go?

Her: (stares half-blankly, half-scared at me as though I'd just spoken to her in Chinese).

Me: (starting to feel a bit stupid because I'm getting no response at all) ...you know, because I don't want to get chased by your security guard on the way out!

Her:  (staccato monotone) You won't.

Me: OK, then.  Thanks for your help (I was - but you'll be pleased to hear it was all fine in the end).

Encounter Three: Local restaurant

Me: Hi, I was just wondering if you had a table for four next Saturday, for about seven-thirty?

Him: (flatly) No, we're booked.

Me: Have you got any other times available for that evening?

Him: (just as flatly) I don't know.

Me: Would it be possible to check?

Him: (sighs) I know we haven't got anything after five o'clock.  I don't have to check that.  OK?

Me: Right.  Thanks anyway.

I ended each of these encounters wondering two things: one; why am I so stupid and meek in not taking to task (even slightly) these people who speak to me like a squelchy decapitated earwig they've just found in their apple turnover, and two: why is genuine, common-sense and just plain nice customer service so rare?  It's not as though I don't ask nicely.

Of course, as we get closer to Christmas and the "season of goodwill" works its magic I suspect those three and countless others like them will be transformed into paragons of helpfulness; their rosy red cheeks gleaming with festive cheer.  But blink and you'll miss it...it's like Santa Claus in that it only happens once a year and only the seriously naive believe it even exists in the first place.

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Things to Do Before You Die!

Magazines have a habit of printing meaningless lists with the title 'Fifty Things to See/Hear/Do/Draw/Taste/Wring Out/Sing/Soil/Swim In (delete as applicable) Before You Die!  Recently I was trying to find something good to watch on telly and caught the tail end of a show on some obscure food channel called 'Twenty Foods to Try Before You Die!' (there's always an exclamation mark on these titles).  The last taste experience on this particular list was the Singaporean durian fruit; the one with a smell resembling blocked drains which is so strong you're forbidden to eat it in public places (there's a little sign on public transport featuring a picture of a durian fruit with a dramatic red line drawn through it, like our 'No Smoking' signs, which I thought was the most bizarre sign I'd ever seen until I went to a restaurant in St. Petersburg and saw the same sign featuring a picture of a gun instead).  I've never tried it, don't plan to and somehow I don't think the last words I'll ever croak will be "Bugger...I never got to try some of that stinky old fruit from Singapore.  This has been no LIFE, I tell you!"

But things do take on a bit more urgency when you're reminded that you have to get them done "before you die!"  I've got countless books and DVD box-sets on my shelves that I haven't got round to savouring yet.  Thinking about which of them I'll actually get to see "before I die!" is quite a sobering experience.  It puts the picking up of 'Jeremy Kyle - You Couldn't Make It Up' in perspective...if I started that and then I died tomorrow, would I really want it to be the very last book I ever read?  What if I was brandishing it as the moment of death arrived?  I'd just be labelled a chav, instead of the highly articulate and intelligent person I actually am, whose friend bought her a copy of the aforementioned book for her birthday as a joke gift.  I don't think that particular book would be on anybody's "quickly!! - read this before you die!" list.  Except perhaps Jeremy's Mum's...but then again maybe not; after all she'll already know the story, won't she?

But everything's essentially a to-do list for before you die.  Things like the washing up, making sure the cat litter's been changed properly and drawing Hitler moustaches on pictures of celebrities in the newspapers left out in the gym coffee lounge.  Even things like that, which when you really think about it make for a more worthy and grounded sort of life than eating durian or swimming with dolphins or climbing mountains.  Really, it does.

Friday, 25 November 2011

Newsagents and the unlikely yet pivotal part they've played in my life so far!

I was round at a friend's house last week, and when I popped into her local newsagents for a Crunchie bar on the way home I found myself being served by my old 'boss'; a man who owned the local newsagents where I did my paper round every Sunday.  He didn't recognise me (which is fair enough when you consider I was fourteen years old when he last saw me; though he himself hadn't changed a bit, aside from the grey hair and his wearing of 'normal' trousers instead of the unflattering too-tight shorts he used to wear in the shop of a Sunday morning in the midst of winter!).

Part of me wondered if he was happy with his lot in life; he's obviously always been a newsagent and did he think that was a fulfilling way to spend the majority of his life, distributing snippets of news and chocolate to the great unwashed of Essex (me included!)  And another part of me couldn't help musing over the 'life lessons' I've learned from my association with newsagents over the years.  Allow me to elucidate...

Right and Wrong - I think I've blogged about this incident before, but the little newsagent's shop on the corner of my road was the scene of my first and last 'crime'; pickpocketing a pack of Wrigley's chewing gum when the nice man who ran the shop's back was turned.  To cut a long story short, my Dad found the wrapper, interrogated me, dragged me back to the shop by my ear and made me confess and pay up out of my pocket money.  I've never stolen anything since.

Patience and Endurance - when I was doing said paper round at the age of fourteen, I had to walk two miles in all weathers carrying a heavy bag full of 'Sunday Times's (why didn't I have more sense and insist on a paper round in a 'Sun' reading street?!).  One lady on my route insisted I post her 'Sunday Times' through section by section, in a particular order (sport last, 'The Funday Times' first).   And there was a man who insisted on actually opening the door to me when I delivered his paper, which would have been fine except he always wore the same stained dressing gown that showed off his grey matted chest hair.

(The newsagent's I worked for had a painted sign outside the shop which stated "Have Your Paper Delivered By Us...Without Any Trouble, Without Any Fuss!"  That never failed to make me laugh, especially when I'd struggle past the sign at 6:30am in the pouring rain).

Empathy - there was a little newsagents' shop my friend and I would always pass when walking home from school.  But we'd rarely ever go inside, because the lady behind the counter had the most unsmiling, scariest face we'd ever seen.  We nicknamed her 'Medusa'.  And then one day I was walking home from school past the shop, when I fell over and cut myself (I was always doing this as a child; I was perpetually covered in so many bumps and bruises that one of my teachers was convinced I was getting beaten up at home, but that's another story!)  'Medusa' had seen me fall over, and came running out of the shop with a plaster.  When she'd patched my knee up for me, she gave me a chocolate bar.  I stopped calling her 'Medusa' after that.

In conclusion...who knows what path of rack and ruin I'd have taken in life had I not been saved by these vital encounters with newsagents during my formative years?!

Thursday, 24 November 2011

An Evening with Will Young

My music tastes have never really been what you might call 'cutting edge'.  I blame my Dad, who not only aurally assaulted my sisters and me from birth with Roy Harper and Leonard Cohen, but when I got my first record player (second-hand from my Nan) we didn't have the money to actually buy any records for a while, so to compensate Dad went up into the attic and found some of his and my Auntie Julie's old record collection from their youth, to keep me going until I could buy the latest 'Now!' compilation (we were only on Now! 8 or 9 then which makes me feel supremely OLD - I think I saw an ad for Now! 11, 235 the other day).  The dust-covered collection included George Formby's 'When I'm Cleaning Windows', something by Lonnie Donegan (of 'My Old Man's a Dustman' fame) and David Cassidy's 'Could it Be Forever' (a song I rather shamefully still play now and know all the words to).

This is a roundabout way of me trying to excuse my fandom of Will Young, whom I've loved ever since I was twenty-three and voting for him non-stop on 'Pop Idol' (the rest of my family were Gareth fans, the philistines!).  You know how there are some artists you like but you just feel a bit embarrassed to admit it?  Well for some reason I've always felt a bit like that about lovely Will...maybe because his audience has always seemed a bit middle-aged and middle-of-the-road (both more like me than I'd care to admit?!)  I can't help it though...he just has one of those rare, wonderful voices that brings me out in goosebumps.  There.  I've said it.

Anyway...I've just come home from a concert of his at a local venue which I thoroughly enjoyed.  And I while I was there I made a few useless observations, which I have decided to report uselessly below, in the name of having nowhere else to put them:

  • Will's music doesn't really lend itself to dancing.  Even the more 'upbeat' tracks are more sway-fests than dance-fests.  It was therefore quite amusing to watch some of the rest of the audience try to decide what to do with their bodies whilst watching and listening to lovely Will.  Some swayed slightly, some clapped (that's always funny as well, watching people decide when they should stop clapping) and some just threw their whole bodies into it with careless abandon.  Even when Will sang 'Leave Right Now'.
  • The lady sitting in front of me spent most of the concert taking pictures of the stage, then posting them to her Facebook page.  She wasn't the only one...the room was littered with people taking endless pictures, or filming the concert and then texting the footage to their friends.  While the concert was going on.  Why?!  How is that in any way enjoyable?
  • I spent most of the concert utterly transfixed by the keyboard player in Will's backing band, who had the cutest, smiliest face on the planet.  Plus he kept doing these endearing little 'twitches' in time with the music and singing along with Will like his life was depending on it.  
  • Will Young dances like someone who's been chained up by his feet, then shoved head first into a paper bag full of tickly feathers.  That was endearing as well.
  • The man next to me evidently thought he could sing as well as Will.  But he was wrong.  

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

The evils of social networking

Reading the paper at lunchtime I noticed an article written by a pregnant lady, who had felt compelled to write all about how she wouldn't be sharing the details/photos/updates regarding her pregnancy on Facebook, and how when she'd told her real-life friends about this, they'd been aghast.  (She finished the article by mentioning that she was aware of the irony involved by her sharing the details in a national newspaper!)  Lots of the comments accompanying the article (as I have established here previously, I always read the online comments!) were from people who felt equally compelled to spout on about how they had "no time for Facebook anyway" and that those who use it should "get a life".

Though I am a snob myself, I really loathe that kind of 'social' snobbishness that involves looking down on people who use Facebook and the like, or who watch things like 'Big Brother' or 'The X-Factor'.  I once watched an episode of 'Grouchy Young Men' (for my sins!) in which lovely Dan Snow summed up the Facebook conundrum by saying "it's just a nice place to share some photos!"  And that's basically my feeling about it as well.

Having said that, the world probably would be a marginally better place if you didn't log on to Facebook to be immediately confronted with about six different 'poo' updates from new parents (referring to their children, just in case you were wondering about the sort of people I mix with online!) Scan pictures are fine, but I have to confess to finding those new '3D' scan pictures incredibly creepy.  Sorry.  But I don't mind general 'baby' updates; it's natural for people to want to share those with the people they care about, isn't it?  And anyway, people moaning on about their jobs, or how tired they are, or the fact that they've just eaten their dinner (OMG!  LOLZZ!) can be a lot worse, for my mind.

I think you can tell quite a lot about someone by their social networking preferences.  I used to have a MySpace account (basically Facebook wearing a Burberry cap and set to music) on which I'd write inane blogs like these; the lack of anything resembling a 'nutter filter' on that site meant I'd get about fifty messages a day from well-meaning sex pests and affable weirdos.  It was actually great fun, reading through these messages and I got at least three story ideas from them all (you have to make the best of these things!)  Now I've been a member of Facebook for a few years, and it's clearly the choice of the more timid and civilised social networker, with all its little managed lists and easily manipulated news feeds, making it the clear choice for the OCD sufferers amongst us as well.  Don't like someone?  Well, with just a click of the mouse Facebook can become your personal mafioso and that person will suddenly cease to exist.  Hours of fun can (probably) ensue by 'friending' people you don't know/don't like and then just getting Facebook to "rub them out" on your behalf (surely it's only a matter of time with all those endless Facebook apps that there'll be one allowing you to send a 'virtual horse's head' to people you don't like?!)

But I've never had a Twitter account; in fact the idea of Twitter scares me a bit.  It all seems a bit frantic and feral over there.  And the concept of having 'followers' piles on the pressure...it gives the impression that you're going to be spouting from an endless fountain of insight, humour and interest.  Not regaling people with things like "Ian Beale off EastEnders reminds me of Stan Laurel with that moustache.  Lolzz!" 

So I guess I'll stick with what I know...my Facebook account allows me to stay in the loop with my four younger sisters, plus I do meet the occasional interesting person through it every now and again.  Just a warning though - anyone who annoys me on there is getting "rubbed out" without a second's thought, OK?

Monday, 21 November 2011

The sun and the moon...are they the same thing?!

Recently I read an snippet in the paper about the 'Celebrity Big Brother' winner and former patron of the Essex pub in which my sister worked (where according to my sister she was "a bit in love with herself") Chantelle Houghton, who exclusively revealed that up until fairly recently, she had thought the sun and the moon were one and the same.  This was followed by a few sneering sentences about her general stupidity from the journalist reporting it.

Now I know Ms. Houghton isn't exactly renowned for being the sharpest pencil in the case, but I felt a bit sorry for her. I'm willing to bet we've all had thoughts that, taken in isolation and reported in the national press, could make us sound ever-so-slightly dense.  For posterity, here are a few of mine.

1. You know when you're talking to someone, or you're watching the news, and you're reminded that "the clocks go forward/back tonight"?  Well, right up until I moved out of home at the age of nineteen I thought all clocks just did this of their own volition.  When I was a lot younger I tried staying up until 2am just so I could see all the clocks going back at the same time, but I was never able to stay awake that long.  Then I moved out of home and I realised my Dad had been putting all the clocks forward and backwards himself.  The truth felt a lot less magical.

2. I once worked in an office where I had to answer telephone requests from newsagents to send out retail promotion packs (and people wonder why I wanted to work for myself?!) Someone called up from Galashiels in Scotland.  I'd never heard of Galashiels and wrote it on the envelope as 'Gala Shields'.  The Sales Director happened to be wandering past my desk at this very moment; he looked at the envelope and burst out laughing.  "It's Galashiels, not Gala Shields!  They haven't just won an award for the 25 metres in swimming!"  I laughed back and said I'd done it as a joke; I'd thought it might have made them smile when the pack arrived.  But I was lying.  I really had thought there was a place called 'Gala Shields'.

3. My Mum used to live on Southend seafront when I was little, and for years I thought I was looking at America when I looked out of her front window (I'd thought the Thames Estuary was actually the Atlantic Ocean). It was ever-so-slightly embarrassing to be told, in voices shaking with laughter, that it was just the Kent coast I'd been viewing in fascinated wonder through the window.

So just a few 'thicko' examples there, then.  If I ever become a famous and sophisticated author a la JK Rowling, expect to see them recreated in the Daily Mail along with the customary sneers!

Thursday, 17 November 2011

The day my Christmas innocence died

So it's that time of year again...the time of year when my friends with children of a 'certain age' are facing that seasonal dilemma regarding when to tell the kids the "truth" about Father Christmas.  It's a difficult dilemma, and one I'm glad I'll never have to confront...although I put my foot in it earlier this week when I was talking to a friend and I said to her "When did you stop believing in Father Christmas?" with her seven year-old daughter in earshot.  I changed the subject swiftly and calmly (the advantage of being the type of person who indulges in regular 'foot in mouth' behaviour is that you get pretty good at recognising it quickly enough to minimise the potential fallout) and I think I got away with it!

I can remember the exact moment I knew myself that Father Christmas wasn't real.  I'd been debating it in my confused little head for a while anyway...so many things didn't add up, most notably the fact that we didn't have a chimney (when I asked my Dad he said Father Christmas came in through the front door, but then I imagined him having to carry enough keys to get into everyone's houses and that just didn't sound very...practical).

But the fateful moment came not from either of my parents, but on a festive day at infants' school, on which our teacher excitedly told our class that Father Christmas had torn his coat while at her house...and she'd brought the piece of coat he'd left behind into school with her for us all to see!  We all clamoured round excitedly as she produced...a piece of red crepe paper with bits of cotton wool glued to the bottom.  Now even at the age of six, it was hard to imagine exactly how a giant piece of crepe paper, a packet of cotton wool balls and a tube of Pritt Stick would provide adequate protection from all that snow in the North Pole...let alone the durability required to go up and down all those pesky chimneys (and what about the pockets for all those keys?)

"That looks like crepe paper with cotton wool on it!" I said loudly and precociously (I didn't have many friends, for some reason), and everybody went quiet.  I looked at my teacher for blessed reassurance that I was wrong, but the slightly panicked look on her face said it all, and I went home feeling supremely disappointed.  I knew Christmas was never going to be quite as good ever again.

(Though I still went along with all the 'Father Christmas' stuff at home because I was a lovely and bountiful older sister who didn't want to ruin all the magic for the little ones, and...well, you got more and better presents if you still believed in Father Christmas!  I wasn't that stupid).

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

2012 and turning 35...with some growing up to do!

So I turn thirty-five next year...the year of the Queen's Diamond Jubilee (I was born in the year of her Silver Jubilee - that woman keeps on stealing my thunder!).

Thirty-five seems a very 'grown-up' age to me.  I'm surprised more people don't mark it as a proper milestone...for me, thirty-five always represented the age of genuine adulthood.  And as such, I've decided I'll be making a few changes in 2012.

Top of the bulging list is to manage my finances.  I currently have an extreme "head in the sand" approach to money-management, most likely borne of the fact that my Dad is exactly the same and so are my sisters...many of my fun childhood memories at the supermarket involve us flinging all manner of stuff into the trolley without any one of us giving a second look to whether or not cheaper versions were available (no Peter Kay-style "roller cola" for us!)  This definitely wasn't because we had money to burn, it was all just a sort of fun, childishly random devil-may-care attitude to the purchasing of stuff that I've retained to this day.

Unfortunately, I'm not one of those people who checks comparison websites or different shops to see if I'm getting good value for money.  I never ask companies to "give me your best deal".  I'm far too clumsy and embarrassed and 'but-people-will-think-I'm-being-rude' for that kind of caper.  My gym had been getting away with charging me double the monthly fee it should have done for years...and I knew about this, and I didn't do anything about it!  Not until last week anyway, when I finally plucked up the courage to ask the manager why I was being charged so much.  It was a simple admin mistake which was instantly and easily corrected, and as I left the gym I got the feeling that I should be taking more care of where my money's going.  Because that's what sensible adults do.

So - next on my list is my mobile phone network.  They keep on calling me to offer me a new plan since my latest contract expired...they know I'm paying too much, they want to offer me something better, and yet I keep avoiding actually speaking to them!  I know - no logic whatsoever.  You might even call it a bit stupid.

But...the reason I don't want to talk to them is because I'm worried they'll bamboozle me with 'science' and I'll end up being talked into signing a new contract that'll see me paying even more than before, and I won't have the guts to say "no" and the salesperson will put the phone down, rubbing their hands and cackling very evilly at my gullibility.  It's like that Jerry Seinfeld joke about the reason why a lot of straight men are wary of being around gay men is because they know, deep down, how easily persuaded they actually are and it wouldn't take much for them to end up talked into becoming gay themselves.  

I will call the mobile phone company, though.  I really will (cough).  Maybe once I've turned thirty-five and turned into a proper grown-up.

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

On not being the "whoop and cheer" type!

There's a gym class I go to every week that reminds me of being back at school, which were definitely not the "best days of my life" (who the hell ever said that, and where are they now?  Probably chewing at the insides of their mouth whilst secured to a table leg by a rusty chain outside a dodgy pub somewhere, I should imagine).

And so this gym class reminds me of being back at school, which is in itself quite terrifying considering how long ago that was, but the really awful thing about it is that it shows me how little I've changed in over twenty years.  

This class is held at lunchtimes, and its regular participants are made up of a large group of people who all work together in the office next-door to the gym...and then there's me.  So there's a real 'school clique' sort of feel to it, from which I am automatically (but not unkindly) excluded by the simple fact that I don't work with them all.  And also because I make absolutely no effort at all to talk to any of them.

I realise I'm presenting this as though it worries me, but it doesn't...what actually worries me is that I don't care and I keep thinking that I should care about how anti-social I can be.  For instance, one of the group recently got engaged.  She ran into the class whooping and flashing her engagement ring around the room, to a deafening cacophony of even more whoops and cheers from the rest of the group.  

Now...you might have guessed that I am not a "whoop and cheer" type of person...well, not unless it's a REALLY special occasion, anyway!  But in this particular class, it's better if you are.  This is basically what I'm referring to about school days; everybody else seemed united in their constant enjoyment and general rebellion, whereas I just drifted obliviously and generally unnoticed, alongside it all.   I did all the homework because I enjoyed all the learning, I spent lunchtimes reading in the school canteen (or going to the newsagents to buy my daily lunchtime staple of three bags of crisps and three chocolate bars...Jamie Oliver would have a heart attack!), and when I was there I didn't much care about anything else.  

And so it goes...in the class I do the workout because it's incredibly tough and I enjoy it, but I'm not interested in all the "whoop and cheer stuff" that goes on before, during and after each session.  But I keep thinking I should be...if only all that didn't take so much mental energy alongside the physical.  And to be honest it'd help if they didn't all come in discussing what's just happened in 'The Only Way is Essex' and how much it costs to wax your armpits (if you're interested, men pay more for waxing certain areas, according to the man who said that, anyway!).  Fun to listen to, but I haven't got anything to add, on the whole, so for now I think I'll just keep on exercising obliviously away.

(God, aren't I boring!)

Sunday, 6 November 2011

Murder mysteries and white fluffy robes

This weekend was spent at a spa, along with a lovely friend.  Not my natural home really, spas; I'm not a fan of enforced serenity (or enforced anything, for that matter) which is the reason I didn't really get on with meditation.  It doesn't matter that I can see and understand all the benefits, my mind just doesn't work that way.  I'm always willing to try it though...how harmful to my over-delicate sensibilities could a weekend of therapists' bad breath, white dressing gowns and soothing aromatherapy oils really be?  (More on that later).

I made sure to take some suitable reading matter with me.  Basically, this means explosive murdery sort of stuff, which works well with the whole 'enforced serenity' surroundings I just talked about.  So I took Mark Billingham's 'Sleepyhead' which was the perfect choice, as it turns out.  Recently I've started to develop a taste for crime fiction; none of that stuff has ever really interested me before save for Christopher Brookmyre's offerings, which are mostly too frenzied and surreal to qualify for true 'crime' (in my mind).  But in reading 'Sleepyhead' I discovered that I quite like being taken for a ride...unlike some friends of mine who are big crime fiction fans I don't bust a mental gut trying to work out 'whodunnit' (seems I'm a bit of a thicko at heart!)  I have some ideas as I read, but I've found I just like going along with it all and then being completely surprised and outwitted at the end.  Great fun.  

But back to the spa.  They're such curious places!  I can't quite get my head around wandering about in a dressing gown all day; this is something you only do at home with the telly on and a vat of Tesco's Cheesy Balls, surely?   When you don't want anybody to see you.  Because they don't suit everybody, fluffy white robes (me included).  And the fluffy uniform gives the place a strange sort of falsely intimate feel, because you're not supposed to see people in their dressing gowns and as such, people are a lot chattier with you than I suspect they'd otherwise be.  You end up learning far more than you really need to about people's recent operations, family feuds and opinions on household recycling (in retrospect I should have taken my notebook!)

I also have trouble staying straight-faced during the treatments.  I can't help it, unfortunately.  It's the music mostly, because I don't get the whole 'crashing waves and whale noises' thing being at all relaxing.   This, coupled with those massage tables where you have to put your face through a hole at the top and the fact that laughing isn't exactly encouraged, makes for an hilarious experience (for me!)  And being English, I feel a bit bad about the concept of a stranger putting themselves out just to make me feel 'relaxed'.  At one point I actually apologised to my therapist for taking up her time.  

But...the spa I went to has an 'exclusive wax bath' on its treatments list, so I decided to try it out.  It consisted of this: being enveloped in candle wax, then a load of clingfilm, then a heavy blanket, after which you're left in the dark for twenty minutes (during which your hands are waxed to your sides so you basically can't move).  I spent the entire twenty minutes in the dark giggling at the absurdity of it all...so much that the therapist kept opening the door to check if I was alright.  I told her the whale CD was playing up.  More great fun!

And it was a fun weekend - I was in good company, and my friend had thoughtfully brought most of the stock from the local Thorntons with her (the spa restaurant shunned chocolate in the same manner that Katie Price shuns natural beauty).  But...no more spa-time for at least a year.  I just don't think I could handle the stress of it all!

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

A solitary social life - quite fun when you think about it

Doing 'social' things on your own really can be fun sometimes.  I say this as someone who quite often goes to writing events, concerts, plays and shows on my own.  This is usually because I don't know many people who have the same tastes as me, and I'd never ask people to come with me to things they wouldn't like - as has been proven in the past I'd just spend the entire time worrying about them, rather than enjoying whatever it was I'd wanted to see or hear.  So it's easier to just do some social thingies on my own and therefore only be concentrating on whether or not I'm enjoying myself; a realisation which has made social events somewhat more relaxed and has also coincided quite nicely with my getting a bit older and wiser and therefore marginally more confident about actually doing things on my own in the first place.

One of the things I love most about being on my own at things is how much more sensitive I am to other people's behaviour; how I'll tend to notice all kinds of subtle nuances I'd probably have missed had I gone along with someone else and been talking to them about work or kids or what's been on telly.  I love that I have absolutely no obligation to talk to anyone at all if I don't want to.  It's a luxurious feeling.

Last week I went to a comedy show at a local theatre...again, not something that anybody I knew was interested in coming along to.  So I booked a single ticket and went on my own.  Because of this I didn't get to the theatre too early; no point sitting around for ages waiting for the show to start, so I got there about five minutes before the support act was due to come on.  As I walked into the auditorium I noticed that my seat was in a bank of three, with a couple already ensconced in the remaining seats.  They had piled coats and bags onto 'my' seat, seemingly with the view that nobody was going to come in at this late point to watch the show on their own.  I wasn't embarrassed about asking them to move their stuff; perhaps it's all the years I've had to do that sort of thing on the train.  But they were clearly a bit rankled by my sudden presence, ruining their seat-solitude and spoiling the resting place they had for their precious Sainsbury's carrier bag, faux snakeskin handbag and two uninspiring duffel coats.  The female half of the couple couldn't help sighing as she moved them all to the floor.  Being suitably English, I apologised to her.

The support act came on; he was very good.  Then there followed a long delay between his set and the main act of the evening, during which it might have been a bit awkward, me sitting on my own with a couple.  But I was prepared!  I always have a book with me for just such an occurrence; for some silly reason it always makes me happy when I get to actually take out the book I carry with me "just in case"; it's like when people ask "Has anybody got a stamp?" and I can produce a whole book of them from my purse because I always have stamps "just in case" as well.  Somehow these things make me more relevant.  And in some cases, a little bit smug as well.

And I was feeling smug on this evening, enjoying reading my book in the theatre whilst all around me people were tutting in irritation at the slight delay.  The couple next to me seemed a bit wearily disconcerted by one another's presence, mentally hurrying the evening along in desperation lest they were forced into actual conversation with each-other.  I was concerned at one point that one of them might start trying to chat to me, so I buried my head deeper within the pages of my book.  And then the male half of the couple, the one I was actually sitting next to, took out a bag of Maltesers from his pocket, opened it and took his time selecting each individual Malteser from the bag carefully before eating them painfully slowly.

After about the fifth Malteser there was a significant pause.  I knew instantly what was going through his mind; he was wondering whether or not he ought to offer me one.  His wife/girlfriend/significant other had just taken a handful and now there he was, trapped in his Malteser-based conundrum with no idea how to solve it.

Now I'm going to diffuse the tension right away and say I wasn't offered one; about ten slow seconds later he went back to rummaging carefully through the bag and starting his selection process all over again.  I wondered whether I ought to shoot him a disapproving look from above the pages of my book, before deciding against it.  But I was amusingly disappointed by his lack of courage.

(Incidentally I'm not averse to offering strangers chocolate; once on a delayed train stuck at depressing Pitsea I had a large box of Ferrero Rochers in my bag that someone at work had given me, which I had no hesitation in breaking open and offering to everybody sitting in my carriage.  You see - I can be sociable when I feel like it!)

I enjoyed all of these little incidents so much that they almost overshadowed the show itself, which was very good.  But I really do recommend everyone goes to a social thing on their own at least once.  Just remember to take a book, "just in case".

Monday, 31 October 2011

How much do I love November? Let me count the ways...

I love it when the clocks go back at the end of October.  I don't care about the extra hour - I could take or leave that actually, especially on a Sunday when time always ticks by excruciatingly slowly anyway.  No - I love the clocks going back because it signifies the onset of lovely November, which is without question my favourite month of the year.  The reasons for this are many and varied, and go as follows:

The beginning of shorter days  Yes, I know I'm probably a bit mad for liking darker and shorter days, but I really do.  I love it when the sky goes dark before 5pm; there's something irresistibly cosy about it, even if I'm out, or somewhere not-very-nice like someone else's dingy office.  If I am out, and I have to travel home on a dark evening, then even journeys on packed trains and buses feel stupidly cosy.  

Atmospheric weather... The weather in November is perfect.  Cold but not yet absolutely freezing; all the leaves are still a beautiful mix of golds and reds set off by moody greying skies.  Perfect for wrapping up in coats, scarves and gloves and taking long walks, then coming home, closing the curtains and putting the fire on.

...leading to atmospheric thinking  I'm sure I'm more creative in winter.  I certainly always feel compelled to write more, and for some reason I'm always the most happy with my wintry witterings than my summery splutterings (this blog post excluded, obviously!) 

Music makes more sense  The music I like tends to be at its most listenable in onset-winter.  This excludes Kylie, whom I just can't listen to when the days go short and dark (unless it's on a dance floor!) But it's in November that I start dusting off Scott Matthews, Ryan Adams, Laura Marling, Freddie Stevenson and Feist - admittedly that selection doesn't make for wild party-ness, but I'm sure my soul is richer for it.

(Many years ago, a friend introduced me to Ryan Adams' music.  I wasn't that enamoured at the time, but he fervently insisted that it wouldn't be long before the songs would ingrain themselves and I would end up thinking of Ryan as "the best singer-songwriter around".  It's a shame I don't see him any more, because I know he'd be pleased that I'm starting to think he was right).

It's the 'good part' of Christmas onsetting  Maybe it's because I'm not a parent, but I've usually lost all interest in Christmas by the time December comes round.  In November everything's still shiny and new and it's too early to be truly cynical - sparkly displays start going up and people excitedly talk about the plans they've made.  Then December comes and all the hard work starts and you realise it's all looming uncomfortably close; you actually DO have to spend an entire fortnight with the family and you start eating and drinking too much and people get you rubbish presents that prove how little they REALLY know you (always disappointing; never mind expense, actual thought really does count as far as I'm concerned), and you've heard all those crappy songs so many times your brain is starting to pickle itself in its own juices and...well, let's just say that in November Christmas is just a "nice idea".

If months were represented in colours, November would be a rich, velvety purple; soft and comfortable and full of character.  So I say...bring on the onset of winter!

Thursday, 27 October 2011

A few stray (and utterly pointless) observations I've made this week

  • I'm so very, very rubbish at spoken Russian.  So much so that I tend to leave my weekly lessons feeling a bit bad about how I must waste my teacher's time, and how she must laugh at me every time she closes her front door after I've gone.  This feeling was recently compounded by our doing sessions focusing on 'How to complain'.  Russian complaints really are quite terrifying; in the listening exercises we've been doing it seems a complaint is only a complaint if the absolute harshest of words are delivered in a staccato monotone reminiscent of steady machine gun fire.  I've tried explaining to my teacher that instructing me on how to say "Get me the manager - now!" is completely wasted, seeing as I'd never have the guts to say things like that in English, let alone in a foreign language and in a foreign country (besides which I'd have the added anxiety of what to say after the manager's been brought to me!)  But still she persists, in that formidable Russian spirit of hers.  It's quite admirable, really.  But then to be honest, even ordering half a kilo of butter sounds like a complaint when you're saying it in Russian.
  • Some people find solace through food, or drink, art or talking; I find it in books and music.  But recently I've started listening to songs and storing them away in my head for possible future use, such as "I'd probably listen to that if I ever got divorced, or if someone close to me died suddenly", or "that's an uplifting one - I'll store it away for when I'm doing the washing-up".  I've also been, quite involuntarily, making mental lists of songs that would be featured not only at my own funeral, but at the funerals of specific people I know ("oooh, so-and-so would LOVE that one - I'll keep it in mind just in case I'm asked to provide the music as they're being lowered into the ground").  Though I haven't been mad enough to make actual suggestions.  Yet.
  • Boringly and predictably, I've just bought a copy of Julian Barnes' 'The Sense of an Ending', in my annual "I must read the Booker winner!" resolution.  I usually alternate a Booker winner with a slightly less mentally taxing book in the name of general sanity, though as this one's only about 150 pages long I may not have that issue this time round.  Jeremy Kyle's autobiography may have to wait a bit longer to be read (incidentally the book I'm reading now, David Nobbs' 'It Had To Be You' is - as always with his books - just like sinking into a warm bath.  I don't know how he makes his characters so warm, likeable and real...even when they're people you really shouldn't have any time for.  But he does, and I admire him so much for it).
  • I love Zumba.  I really, really do.  But when I'm at the front of the class and there's a mirror I'm reminded of just how un-Latin I look, plus I don't think its creators, based in Brazil, ever really considered how a Zumba class might look when being performed in a shabby community college in Essex on a rainy evening in October, by overly-white people wearing unflattering leggings.  Then again...that's probably exactly why I do love it so much.

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Inspired by 'Looking at Geese'...what makes me a writer

Recently I read A.L.Kennedy's latest novel, 'The Blue Book'.  I chose it partially for research reasons; my next, as-yet-unwritten novel will be based around the idea of psychic therapy, and partially because I enjoyed A.L.'s Guardian columns about her day-to-day life as a writer.

'The Blue Book' didn't disappoint.  I'm never quite sure what I'm looking for when I pick up a new book, but I do know that the writing I love the most 'feeds the soul' in some way.  Tolstoy is a master of literary soul-food, as are most Russian writers I've read (and one of the many reasons I wanted to learn the language).  And so 'The Blue Book', like the best of 'em in my opinion, wasn't a particularly easy read - but it was a deep and beautifully written one.  One that when I finished, made me feel as though I'd swam a little bit out of my depth and learned something valuable about human behaviour (all that for about £7.99, which for me marks it out as exceptionally good value as well!)

Out of general interest I had a look at A.L.'s website, on which there is a section entitled 'For Writers'.  Nestled in this section is some of the best advice for writers I've ever read, including a wonderful essay called 'Looking at Geese'.  'Looking at Geese', however, is more than just a few pieces of dull, hastily-written advice to "make a plan and stick to it", it's a reflective, unapologetically detailed reflection of Kennedy's writing-and-performing life.  I found it utterly mesmerising.  It made me want to replicate it; to dive straight into my own (marginally less successful!) writing journey.  And it'll probably go on for a while, and I'm not a famous or even halfway successful writer so I doubt it'll be of any interest to anybody except me.  But I'm going to do it anyway (so there...)

Older family members have told me that it was my Mum who was responsible for my "exceptional reading skill" as a small child, due to her immersive encouragement of it.  If that was the case then I'm grateful.  Well - I am now.  At the time, being good at reading singled me out.  Every day we'd have "reading time" in the school library, during which my classmates would get to pick from the entire library-worth of books, whereas I'd have to go on my own to a little table in the corner on which would be three or four 'advanced reading' books.  Nobody bothered explaining this to me at the time; for months I just thought I must be a bit backward, or that I was being punished for something.  It's typical even of my behaviour now that I didn't ask anyone about it!  Instead I'd just come home and scribble all my worries in my little diary.  I always did that; it was far easier than actually having to talk to anyone.

The first book I can ever remember making an impact on me is Enid Blyton's 'Wishing Chair Collection', which I read aged about seven.  My Dad had ordered me to go to sleep, so I finished it by torchlight under the covers, and when I woke up the next morning I thought I'd had a dream about reading a really wonderful book; one that had made me laugh and cry and desperate to read all over again.  I was disappointed that it had just been a dream.  But then I got up, and was elated when I saw the book right there on the floor, ready to be savoured all over again.  That was the first time I remember realising that words could have a real effect.  That realisation, even at seven, felt amazingly potent.  I decided then that I'd like my own words to have that sort of effect.  I read more and more and more; looking up new words I found in the dictionary and making long lists in the backs of my diaries, of the words I liked the sound and construction of, and words I thought 'sounded' all wrong and how I'd improve them.

(Somewhat unsurprisingly, I didn't have many friends!)

But somewhat ironically, if my words ever did achieve any sort of effect then it embarrassed the absolute hell out of me.  Once, my teacher decided to read out a story I'd written in our school assembly.  I was so mortified to be 'singled out' that I ran off and cried (what a bloody annoying child I must have been!).  Another time my English teacher raced across the school playground to tell me excitedly that a story I'd handed in was the most beautifully descriptive he'd ever read for a child of my age; that he'd re-read it so many times that he could probably recite it back to me.  Was I proud?  No!  A group of my classmates had overheard, and all I wanted was to sink right through the floor.

(I was often embarrassed in maths lessons too, but for completely different reasons...my maths teacher once told my Dad that I had the worst level of mental arithmetic in the entire school).

The only writing I continued to do throughout my teenage years and slightly beyond was in those diaries, although I was constantly coming up with little ideas for stories and novels.  I was just too lazy to get them written down properly, I suppose, plus the task always seemed a bit daunting.  I was scared of what might happen if I managed to lose myself in my writing, which seemed to me far too easy to make happen.  A lot of writers say they can't help not writing; that it's as natural for them as breathing, but for me it felt like an urge I was constantly doing my absolute best to suppress.

I still read, though.  And by now the words I was reading were serving as an education of sorts.  As I've said, I rarely actually talked to people.  If I wanted to know anything, I'd go to the library and read about it.  The library was a godsend, in those days before the iPod and iPhone had been invented!  And I think one of the reasons I want 'soul food' from the books I read now is because books have always been such a lifeline for me, and such a font-of-all-knowledge.  I feel a bit short-changed if I read something that's just supposed to be a bit of light entertainment.  If I want that I'll watch telly instead.

All the non-writing continued until I reached a 'quarter-life crisis' of sorts, in my mid-twenties.  I hated my job; my life seemed to be going nowhere.  Nothing interested me.  I decided to make an appointment with a careers coach, who asked me if there was anything I'd always wanted to do...what I wanted to be when I grew up.  Without even thinking about it, I said "writing".  I felt I must have sounded completely stupid and deluded, to think I could make a career out of something like that.  But the careers coach took me seriously, and suggested that if nothing else, I should join a writers' course of sorts to test my scribblings out; see what I thought.  So I did.

Luckily, the course I chose was fun and interesting, with a great teacher.  I also made a really good friend from it, so I'm doubly grateful.  And it did the job of making me finally realise that, once and for all, I definitely wanted to write!

But were my words any good?  The course yielded mixed reviews.  The very first piece I turned in, about a man-turned-woman and entitled 'The First Day' (a title provided by the teacher), was trashed by my course-mates.  Somewhat arrogantly, I wasn't quite convinced of its total rubbishness, so I joined a 'writing showcase' website on which I could post all my offerings to my heart's content.  It turned out to be an invaluable place to test out a few styles and gain some interesting feedback.  One of my stories even got selected for a collection of the site's subjectively-judged "best work".  That's the only accolade my writing has ever won so far; ironically and true to form it's also the piece I'm the most embarrassed about having written.

And so now I've got to the point where I've completed three drafts of my first novel, and now I've got to the point at which writing really is the only thing I want to do; the only thing that - pretentiously-sounding-enough - makes me feel completely at one with myself.  Slowly I'm worrying less and less about losing myself in writing; in fact I'm beginning to understand that I probably have to, to produce anything really worth reading.  And it doesn't matter if I get published or not.  Actually I'm lying - it does! - but it won't affect whether I will continue to write or not.

As A.L.Kennedy (to whom I have just written a rather poor tribute!) wrote: "I am a writer - because I'm made this way"

Monday, 24 October 2011

Train Etiquette

Last week I read an article in the paper, written by an 'ordinary' commuter.  It consisted of a detailed map of a typical train carriage, together with an explanation of the modus operandi he would use in order to a) get a seat in the mornings, and b) ensure no 'undesirables' would sit next to him.  The map in itself was a work of art, albeit a special work of art you might see at an "outsider art" exhibition.  Reading that, along with the intricate explanations accompanying it, you might be forgiven for thinking this man had tendencies bordering on the insane.

But as a former regular London-bound commuter, I could understand his anxiety on both counts.  Travelling to work by train was an exhausting experience, not just because it's crowded and noisy, but because you're in a small, public space in which you're closely confined with other people, yet unable to control their behaviour.  Some people (I'm not saying me specifically, just some people...) can find that sort of thing quite stressful, on the whole.

Now, getting-a-seat-wise I was generally lucky.  Lucky enough that both of Southend's two stations are at the start of their respective lines, so I'd never have to stand.  The only problem that would ever arise would be on the occasions when someone got on just before me and chose 'my' seat.  I don't know why I had a favourite seat; I just did.  It's the same as when I go to the gym; I'm annoyed if someone's had the gall to use 'my' locker.  It must be one of many signs that I haven't got enough truly important stuff going on in my life.  But anyway...

...if anyone ever did sit in 'my' seat I'd shoot them a furious glare and then imagine something mildly unpleasant happening to them during their day, like stepping in a pile of dogs' mess or slipping on a empty crisp packet in front of someone they really wanted to impress (it makes me wonder if whenever things like that happen to me it's in payback for unknowingly taking someone's 'usual' train seat or gym locker...but if it actually was then I unknowingly do those things far more often than would be normal).  My 'favourite' seats are those ones right by the doors; in a bank of two that face the backs of the seats in front, which means you can't put your feet up.

People putting their feet up on the seats in front of them is my absolute worst 'train bugbear'.  Worse than music blaring from phones and iPods; worse than braying tones on mobiles asking what's for dinner or complaining about why Sharon from reception can't do Roger's filing on Wednesdays.  Why are there signs on trains telling people to "keep your feet off the seats"?  People who don't put their feet on the seats don't need them, and those who do just ignore them.

Once I was travelling by train to a meeting with a colleague I didn't know very well.  He sat down and immediately stretched his legs out onto the seat in front.  Without thinking, I slapped the leg closest to me and hissed "get your feet off those seats; people have got to sit on those later!" like an angry mother.  He laughed.  The people sitting on the adjacent seats laughed.  But I wasn't being funny.

I don't mind people sitting next to me on trains; I just wish I could control who I got.  If the doors opened, people got on and then stood in an obedient line while I decided who'd be the least offensive to my delicate sensibilities, that'd be great.  But that isn't what happens.  Usually I get the person who smells like last night's takeaway, or who's doing their make-up (once I got someone who took out a pair of tweezers and plucked their eyebrows on the train!), or who's intent on listening to music I hate through tinny headphones, or who just has to call everyone in their phone's address book lest they're left alone with their own thoughts for more than three seconds.  Or, on a really bad day, all four.

Derren Brown's tip for dissuading people from sitting next to you on the train is to grin at them inanely whilst invitingly patting the seat next to yours.  But that approach only works if you're a man.  If you're a woman trying that technique then the results can end up being quite scary.  Especially if you're coming home on the late Friday night train.  Especially if you live in Essex.  Definitely not recommended.

So there you go...proof that talking about public transport as a commuter can make you sound insane alarmingly quickly.  I may have misjudged that article...now I'm going to go back to it and see if I can pick up any genuine tips.

Friday, 21 October 2011

The youth of today...tsk

I had to wait in for the gas man today.  "We'll be there between eight and one" said the not-very-friendly person on the phone to whom the boiler problem had been reported (aside: why don't call centre people ever sound very friendly?  I used to be a call centre person; I wasn't very happy about it, I worked too-long shifts and I wasn't being paid much, but I felt it was part of my job to at least try to sound nice and helpful, which may have been why I didn't get many 'problem' customers.  But still...)

True to their word, the gas man was round at nine-thirty promptly (don't you just hate it when they turn up at twelve fifty-nine?).  He refused a cup of tea, which was a good thing - seeing as even while I was offering it I remembered there was, as usual, no milk in the house - and duly trudged over to the boiler.

Now we've had gas men round to fix things in the past, and they've all been of a similar ilk; late fortysomething/early fiftysomething, greying and a trifle huffy.  Today's man, though, was twenty (I know this because he told me) and full of the joys of spring.  Even when, as I suspected, the intermittent boiler problem failed to occur for a full fifteen minutes after he arrived; leaving him standing around while I fluttered about, frantically turning taps on and off and spluttering "the water'll go cold again in a minute!  It will - honestly!"   

Thankfully it did, and the gas man got to work.  As he did so he took several calls on his mobile (including one from someone he'd been out with last night; his side of the call began with "I'm so not ready for work today, mate - had such a large one last night I don't know what I'm doing") before having to call a 'boiler specialist' (what a great job to have - seriously!) to check the problem due to the fact that he actually didn't know what he was doing.  While the boiler specialist had him on hold he told me a few things about himself; age, relationship and career status and his optimistic aspirations in life.  He was actually quite charming (though he didn't fix the boiler - that's happening next week, apparently).

And as I was talking to him I got that sinking feeling I get sometimes when I talk to members of the younger generation...that I just don't understand them.  Two things in particular baffle me: their music and their confidence.  The former because it's not aimed at me and as such I find it contemptible (I actually caught myself once saying to a young person something along the lines of "Madonna already did everything Lady Gaga's ever done...and better" before wanting to kill myself).  The latter because when I was twenty I had zero confidence, so I can't relate to twenty year-olds who do; twenty year-olds who are chatty and happy and all that.  I relate to outsider-mentality angst.  But youth-related angst seems to have completely disappeared these days.  Log on to Facebook and all you'll find from today's tweenagers will be a barrage of self-taken iPhone pics and "Like for a rate!" statuses.

Come the revolution I'll be cowering in the corner with my Madonna LPs while the youth of today are out conquering the world in meat dresses.  Still, the next Prime Minister has to come from this lot.  Just don't be surprised if their first order of business is to call the American president with something along the lines of "I'm so not ready for work today, mate - had such a large one last night I don't know what I'm doing".

Monday, 17 October 2011

Have Your Say Below!

One of my very guiltiest pleasures; one of the things I like best to do with a cup of coffee and a computer, is perusing the 'online comments and reviews' sections of newspapers, Trip Advisor, Amazon and the like.  All walks of life can be found there.  In fact it has been known for me to write entire short stories based on an outraged comment someone made about a sugar paste flower making kit, or on an embittered list of all the reasons why Jennifer Aniston shouldn't have worn a leather minidress to the premiere of her latest film (yes, that one did come from the Daily Mail).

People really will bang on about anything online.  I particularly love those Amazon or Trip Advisor reviews where the commenter is a) unreasonably angry and b) goes on in disproportionate detail about whatever it was that angered them, like a snotty receptionist or unreliable delivery times.  My eagerness to read these comments reminds me of a Charlie Brooker column I read once, in which he explained how obsessed he became in seeking out work by terrible journalists (in particular Joe Mott from The Sun).  If I'm reading something online and there's a 'Have Your Say!' bit underneath, I'll generally always read the comments.  Sometimes I won't even bother with the article.

It's also fun (read: mildly entertaining) to spot the same old comments that come up time and time again; apparently the best way to describe a good breakfast on Trip Advisor is to say "it sets you up for the day!" as though a rubber doorstop slathered in blackcurrant jam wouldn't do the same job.  When describing a mid-range hotel it's seemingly mandatory to say something like "it wasn't the Ritz, but then you get what you pay for".

Those same old comments appear time and time again because we're all quite a predictable bunch, really.  Nowhere is this more prevalent than on online dating profiles, another previous 'slight obsession' of mine (and a hypocritical one at that, seeing as I would never subject myself to that kind of online scrutiny, even if I'd been single for a hundred years.  Mind you, if I had been single for a hundred years then I doubt Match.com would be enough to save me anyway.  I wouldn't bother including a 'recent photo' either).  The most boring, and also the most ubiquitous, statement people put on their profiles was "I'm looking for someone I can cuddle up with on the sofa, with a bottle of wine and a DVD"  That's the apparent Holy Grail of relationships, right there.  Bit depressing really, isn't it?  Although I suppose it depends on the year and vineyard of the wine, and what DVD in particular.  But no-one ever goes on to mention those details.

No - what I'd really like to see on dating sites is a 'Have Your Say Below!' section under each profile, on which people who have previously gone on dates or had a long-term relationship with that person can comment on their experiences.  Or if you were short on time, maybe a little 'survey' bit where you could just tick whether you'd recommend them to a friend, whether you'd consider going out with them again and indicate if they were good value for money.  And of course there'd have to be a bit where you could 'Submit your own photos!' as well.

I'll suggest it to Match.com and see what happens.

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Celebrate St. George's Day - or ELSE!

This morning I looked out of the window and noticed a tall, ramrod man with a combover and a gait like that of Allo Allo's Herr Flick, pushing a leaflet through the letterbox.  After performing this task, he jogged back up the pathway as if mortally afraid of the information he'd just imparted.  I watched him as he attacked a few more houses, to which his approach was the same; a tentative shuffle up to the letterbox, quickly shoving through a piece of white paper, then jogging back again.

I went to collect the leaflet, which was a propaganda piece introducing a new political party (I won't name it here out of general fairness) which featured a picture of a young couple with gaffa tape stuck over their mouths.  "NO VOICE!" spluttered the leaflet ominously.

"The Establishment HATE the English - we are despised and forgotton" it continued.  Which I must admit isn't a good start, really - I mean if you're going to complain all about how the English are hated in their own country and how you're going to save us all then surely it would be good to tell us about it in articulate sentences without any spelling mistakes?

The leaflet then rambled on about what its party would do once elected.  "Abolish political correctness!" "Leave the European Union!" "No illegal immigrants!" "Council-funded St. George's Day celebrations!"  


Like most people with a working brain, I'm happy to listen to any argument that has fact and reason to back it up.  I might even be prepared to change my views on the back of an intelligent argument made by somebody who knows what they're talking about.  But "Abolish political correctness!" isn't one of them.  In fact there was no definition of what "political correctness" even meant, just an assumption that we've all read enough copies of the Daily Mail to know it's all "gone mad" and must be stopped at all costs.

Out of morbid curiosity I looked at the party's website, predictably decorated in red and white; and presumably unaware of the utter irony that it's political parties like these that go a long way towards 'normal' people feeling a bit embarrassed about displaying an England flag anywhere, lest people think they're a) a football hooligan, b) a member of the BNP, or c) a white van driver.

Yet determined to be fair, I decided to have a look at the full manifesto they'd posted on their website, just to see if lurking behind all the nationalist screeching, this new party really did have some ideas or arguments worth listening to.  "We will abolish all political correctness in all its forms" went the first chapter, again with no actual definition of what they meant.  It made me angry, that somebody had written that and considered it a valid policy statement.  Not just because it's vague and unworkable, but also because "political correctness", for all its faults, at least has its roots in genuine compassion and consideration regarding how we treat each-other.  It's like the Richard Littlejohn vendetta against what he calls "'elf and safety"...not perfect by any means, but its very existence shows a basic concern for people's welfare.  Isn't that a good thing; don't these things confirm in some small way the fact that we're not barbarians?  I don't want to live in a world where "political correctness" is abolished, thanks.  Next.

I'm always intrigued by people who go on about "celebrating St. George's Day" and how not enough people do it.  Such people always carry on as though we've been banned from celebrating it, when we're all free to celebrate it as much as we want.  It's just...in reality the reason is far more likely to be that it's not much fun.  "People in England celebrate St. Patrick's Day more than they do St. George's Day!" the website shrills.  Well of course they do.  Because the St. Patrick's Day celebration amounts to no more than wearing a silly hat, singing and getting drunk.  Not sitting in a dusty room being forced to sing the National Anthem and getting offered weak tea by someone with a curtain rod (Made in England (TM)) stuck up their backside.

(I always think of the irony in being asked to celebrate St. George anyway - a saint reportedly born in Syria and who had never even been to England as far as we know).

But that's the thing with all these nationalist-styled political parties.  There's no humility; no sense of humour or genuine humanity in anything they spout on about.  And for the most part they don't even know what it is they're actually trying to defend.  Reading on, the manifesto promised to provide a definition of what 'English' really meant, for the edification of its readers.  This enlightening definition read as follows:

"The English can be defined in the same way that other nations are defined"


Thanks for that.  See you at the ballot box.

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Seeing the world in soft-focus

Recently I've been thinking about getting contact lenses.  Shameful as it is to admit, the reason is for pure vanity's sake.  I've worn glasses since I was fourteen, but (and this is important) sporadically - when I've felt like it.  I never really felt as though I needed them.  But a recent trip to the opticians confirmed that I am at the age and stage when I should be wearing them all the time.  A "non-beglassed" version of me should no longer exist (except for sleeping, of course.  I'm not mad).

When I got my first pair of glasses, the optician told me I was "long-sighted".  I was secretly pleased at the time.  Short-sightedness was redolent of old ladies with pairs of gold-rimmed lorgnettes dangling from their necks, who'd squint disarmingly at you as you spoke to them.  Long-sightedness, whereby you can see things in the distance better than you can up-close, felt like a sort of super-power!  Plus, at the time I felt my glasses might be good props to hide behind.  But not all the time.  It was interesting and handy to change between "glasses me" and "non-glasses me" whenever I felt like it.

Over the years, being long-sighted has cast a general haze of soft-focus over the world for me, which has been quite useful when I don't actually want to see things too clearly.  My own face in the mirror, for example.  And I know all this will work perfectly well with contact lenses as well as glasses.  I just suppose that now I really have to choose between a permanent "glasses me" and a "non-glasses me" then vanity will win out (as it tends to do) and I'll choose the latter.

I'll miss "glasses me" though.  It'll be strange, reading and writing without them, plus I was looking forward to perfecting my disapproving "over the top of the glasses" stare at people; something I've tried but generally just get laughed at.  That's how I know I'm not really old yet...once people start taking those stares of mine seriously then I'll really know I've turned into a crinkly old harridan.

So I guess in conclusion, glasses are more interesting than contact lenses.  But I'd have a bit of a job stylishly accessorising them with glittery Christmas party dresses, for example, and therefore they'll probably have to go.  How very disappointing.

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

In praise of the 'smiley face'

Last night I watched the latest episode in the (marvellous!) new series of 'Curb Your Enthusiasm', in which Larry admonishes his new girlfriend with something along the lines of "Stop texting smiley faces...it's like I'm having a conversation with a ten year-old"

I was immediately dismayed.  Because a) I like to think that Larry and I are kindred spirits in some sort of quirky, misanthropic way, and b) I use smiley faces all the time, in texts, e-mails and everything.  Almost as much as I like to smile in real life :)

And obviously, because I do it myself, I've never seen the use of smiley faces as annoying.  They just help to distinguish between a comment that's supposed to be funny or light-hearted, and one that isn't.  Because - hey - not everybody's as clever or funny as I am :D (see what I did there?  FYI that wasn't even a smiley face, that was a grinning face - reserved for the REALLY intended-to-be-face-smashingly-hilarious comments!).

I do draw the line though, you'll be pleased to hear.  The line is drawn neatly and precisely where the smiling stops and the "laughing out loud" begins.  I never, ever 'LOL'.  'LOL' conjures up a picture of a court jester jiggling the bells on his hat in a desperate attempt at being 'zany'...besides which 'LOL' just sounds deranged, particularly when people use it at the end of sentences that weren't even funny.  You can get into trouble with 'LOL' as well, like a distant friend of mine did when she added 'LOL' to the end of a message sent to her male boss, who thought it meant "lots of love".   There's no such confusion with a smiley; even if you added one to a sentence like "sorry to hear about your best friend dying" you could just say you were trying to add some brightness to a dark time (it's not an excuse I've tried, or would like to try, but still...it's an excuse!)

A particularly sarcastic friend once commented on how the use of smileys had been his saving grace on more than one occasion...he could get away with saying anything he liked, he said, as long as he put a little smiley face on the end of it.  There's something in that, especially speaking as somebody who has been described on more than one occasion as "quite a serious person".  I'm somebody who needs smileys if I want to keep my friends and general acquaintances.   Plus I only use Amish-style smileys; the bog-standard colon-and-a-bracket, not those awful animated ones you can download from the internet.  Which in my mind makes my use of them a little bit more justifiable, somehow.  

So in conclusion, I haven't quite been swept into the heaving maelstrom of message-smiliness.  I just dabble, that's all...so there's hope for me yet. 

But if I ever 'LOL', then I shall instruct somebody to shoot me immediately afterwards.

:)

Thursday, 6 October 2011

'Empty orchestrations' and what they say about YOU!

I'm a big fan of karaoke.  Not doing it, you understand.  Never actually doing it.  But watching it - definitely.  I'm genuinely fascinated by karaoke, because in this sold-as-fun activity you get a fleeting, yet genuine, idea of what people think of themselves by the song they select and the way they sing it - even from the way they approach the mic.  It's "just a laugh" they all say, but of course it isn't really; in that rendition of 'My Heart Will Go On' you get a true glimpse of lives unlived; of what might have happened if only Simon Cowell had wandered in to your office, heard you singing along with the radio and offered you a £50-million recording contract on the spot.

I used to have a theory that only people who were terrible at singing should ever do karaoke; that it should be unequivocally claimed by those who really enjoyed singing, but just weren't very good.  Because it's all entertainment at the end of the day, and nothing's more boring than listening to someone with an average voice doing karaoke.  Even the X-Factor producers know that much...or at least they did once.

One of the most fun karaoke-related evenings I've ever spent was on an American cruise from New York to the Bahamas.  There was a 'Karaoke Show!' in the cocktail bar, to which I went along (that evening also included an embarrassing incident whereby I made a very English comment about a cocktail named 'French Kiss'...that a very American barman completely misunderstood).  Americans doing karaoke have a different attitude to the English.  No pretend shyness; they just stride confidently up to the mic and then deliver stunningly good performances...and the message is crystal-clear - if you're no good, you shouldn't be doing it.

As fun as those self-satisfied performances were to watch, there was such a sanitised and serious air to it all that I wanted to inject some humour by grabbing the mic myself, hoping to recreate that lovely bit in 'My Best Friend's Wedding' when Cameron Diaz gets up and sings 'I Just Don't Know What to Do With Myself' so badly that she ends up bringing the whole room along with her.  But life isn't like the movies (really?) and in reality I was too worried about getting booed off the stage in a shower of 'French Kiss'-es instead, so I didn't bother.

(The only time I've ever actually been caught out is when my sister got her own karaoke machine, then invited me and my husband round for dinner.  I was adamant that I was just going to watch and listen, but my sister wouldn't take no for an answer. "I'll do a duet with you" she said, and we did a rendition of 'Don't Go Breaking My Heart' with me as Kiki Dee. Five seconds into the song all my karaoke-based reticence had completely disappeared, and no more than ten minutes later I was belting out 'Stand By Your Man' like my entire life was depending on it.  Meanwhile, my husband and brother-in-law had taken refuge outside in the garden).

Such a laugh!

Monday, 3 October 2011

Chatting about the weather - one of my most favouritest pastimes!

I hate that English conversational staple, The Weather.  It's so listless and anodyne as a subject for general discussion that there should be a blanket ban on its use.  Or it should be completely acceptable that if you were talking to someone, and they said something like "Hasn't it been hot recently!" you could just blow a raspberry right into their face before sloshing them in whatever drink you happened to be holding at the time.

But now I'm exaggerating.  And I'm also going to turn into a massive hypocrite by saying (clears throat)... hasn't it been hot recently!

The weather-obsessed media has been going mad of late, calling this an 'Indian Summer' (though to be technical a warm spell is only supposed to be termed an 'Indian Summer' if it happens in November or December) and the papers have all been begging us to 'Send in your photos!' as they always do when the sun's out or there's been a bit of snow.  What always strikes me is how unoriginal these photos are; they're mostly of badly made snowmen or people on the beach.  Why waste the opportunity to be a bit creative?  How about one of yourself in a bath of ice cubes (that might work for both weathers actually) or a quick snap of the face of person sitting next to you on the train...at the very moment you've been told about an hour-long delay due to "the tracks having melted in the extreme heat".  

Personally, I don't like this weather very much, though you wouldn't have known that on Saturday, when I was swanning along the Embankment in a sundress listening to Melody Gardot.  No - the reason I don't like this weather much is because it's so bland.  I can only deal with a few sunny days a year (which is probably a good thing considering!) because after those few days everything's just a bit more dull.  All everybody does is laze around in shorts and have barbecues.  Boring.  In winter you're forced to do more...even if it's just in an attempt to keep warm.  Winter weather has more offbeat character; plus you can appreciate a journey and its end far more if you've had to make it outside in bracing wind, rain or snow.  There's also something comforting and serene about putting the fire on and then looking out of the window on a freezing cold or rainy day, because everything's so much quieter and far less frantic.  People are frantic when hot weather comes to this country; so desperate are they to enjoy it before it goes again.

It's also a lot harder to get any work done when it's hot, precisely because it is "holiday" weather, encouraging the "lazing around in shorts" I just mentioned.  Not that I'm doing that now, of course.  I'm working extremely hard.

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

A foray into politics (stop yawning!)

I've always been mildly interested in politics.  To be honest, I didn't have a great deal of choice in the matter; my Dad thought it was of importance that I learned something about how the country was run.  When I was a little girl in the Eighties he tried to explain the difference between the Conservative, Labour and Liberal parties by saying "Imagine a cow.  Now...the Conservatives would only give the milk to the rich, Labour would only give it to the poor and the Liberals would give it to everyone".  It was a genius explanation I've (obviously!) never forgotten.  Dinner times would sometimes be peppered with Dad's questions, such as "who lives at Number Eleven Downing Street?"  But I'll stop there, before you start getting too jealous of all the mad fun and frolics present in my childhood home.

As I grew into my teens I thought politics might just be a good career path for me; it seemed like an important sort of job to have.  One with a bit of gravitas.  So I mentioned it when I went to see our school's careers advisor, who took out a file marked 'Politics' for me to read, inside which was a cassette tape with a picture of an uncharacteristically angry-looking John Major on the inlay card.  I took one look at it and handed the file back.  "Have you got anything on journalism?" I asked, and that was to be the end of my short-lived political aspiration.



Now I'm old enough to admit it, I have to say I quite enjoy reading political memoirs and reading the 'Politics' sections of newspapers.  But I also have to say how much I dislike the bland uniformity of politicians and their policies now.  You'd have a job, getting kids at all interested in politics these days with the current lot on offer.  It's as though they've all turned into robots.  Say what you like about Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair; at least they were inspirational leaders you could either get behind or deride with some sort of interest, or passion, which is what seems to be entirely missing these days.

Last week one of our local candidates knocked on the door.  "Hello..." he said, with all the charisma of a damp cauliflower.  "I'm just doing a door-to-door service to find out what issues people have got in the area.  What do you want us to do?"  


It was a tempting question...but (perhaps unfairly) I looked at his vacant, glassy-eyed expression that told me that whatever I said would get a bland "I'll take that on board" sort of comment that would promptly be forgotten about as soon as I closed the door.  So I said I didn't have anything to tell him.  He looked faintly relieved.

"Can I just tick what party you support, before I leave?" he asked.  I replied that I didn't support any one party; I just read all the manifestos and then vote for whichever one makes the most sense.  "You actually read the manifestos?" he said with a raised eyebrow.  "My goodness - I don't think even I've read ours".  Then he smiled.  I think that was supposed to be a joke, but I'm not entirely sure.

Later that day I mentioned my encounter with the politician to a friend of mine, who is a father of two.  "I don't bother with all that," he said "...they're all the same, aren't they?"  His little girl was in the room when he said this, and my Dad's spirit immediately rose up in me.  "You can't say that in front of your kids!" I said, only half-joking.  "How are they going have any pride in learning about how we run the country, and their part in it?" (I can be a pompous cow at times).

At this, my friend's little girl came over to me.  "What should we be learning, then?" she asked.  I thought for a moment, and then I said "Imagine a cow.  Now...the Conservatives would only give the milk to the rich, Labour would only...oh, actually I don't know any more...just forget it!"